<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moving Target of Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accessibilityblog.com/2006/06/29/the-moving-target-of-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accessibilityblog.com/2006/06/29/the-moving-target-of-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Raising the awareness of Web Site Accessibility and Marketing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.accessibilityblog.com/2006/06/29/the-moving-target-of-accessibility/#comment-4857</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accessibilityblog.com/2006/06/29/the-moving-target-of-accessibility/#comment-4857</guid>
		<description>Wow, that sounds like an exciting project.  Unfortunately, I can't say I'm too surprised by the attitude problems.  I've heard enough stories about that kind of thing by this point to pretty much chronically expect it.  

It's really interesting to hear that they're really attempting to be massively thorough - it seems like a chronic issue that some population another is dismissed - for budget reasons, decision that the population is insignificant, or whatever.

Of course, there are likely to always be situations that just weren't considered, but the attempt in itself is fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that sounds like an exciting project.  Unfortunately, I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m too surprised by the attitude problems.  I&#8217;ve heard enough stories about that kind of thing by this point to pretty much chronically expect it.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really interesting to hear that they&#8217;re really attempting to be massively thorough - it seems like a chronic issue that some population another is dismissed - for budget reasons, decision that the population is insignificant, or whatever.</p>
<p>Of course, there are likely to always be situations that just weren&#8217;t considered, but the attempt in itself is fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.449 seconds -->
